xxxx
Username:
Password::
----





AmpedStatus Features

Bill Moyers on The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States [Video & Audio]

Bill Moyers on The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States [Video & Audio]

On March 1st, Bill Moyers gave his first public speech in three years, as the final speaker in the Dowmel Lecture series. In his speech, he addressed what he feels is "the greatest threat" to our country: the staggering inequality of wealth and the death of the middle class.

Full Report: The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

Full Report: The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

Read the full six-part report in one post. You can also download the full report with links and graphics or as a print-friendly document. HELP SPREAD THE WORD!

Max Keiser Interviews David DeGraw — The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the USA [video]

Max Keiser Interviews David DeGraw -- The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the USA [video]

David DeGraw appeared on the Keiser Report to discuss his new book, "The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the USA." DeGraw: "The American public needs to understand that we have been attacked. We are in an economic war right now and all economic indicators say that things are going to get worse...."

Part VI: How to Fight Back and Win: Common Ground Issues That Must Be Won — The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the USA

Part VI: How to Fight Back and Win: Common Ground Issues That Must Be Won

These are the core common-ground issues that we must urgently rally around and support. Unless we organize and take decisive action on all these issues, we will all suffer the consequences of our collective inaction.

Part V: Overcoming the Divide and Conquer Strategy — The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the USA

Part V: Overcoming the Divide and Conquer Strategy - The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

The most significant bias in the mainstream media is not the liberal or conservative views propagated to divide, distract, confuse and create apathy among the populace; the ultimate bias is in what is missing from the coverage...

Part IV: The Financial Coup d’Etat — The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

Part IV: The Financial Coup d'Etat - The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

The entire bailout is strategically designed to eliminate the US middle class. Every time you hear the word "bailout," you should think "coup d’état."

Part III: Exposing Our Enemy - Meet the Economic Elite

The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America: Part III: Exposing Our Enemy - Meet the Economic Elite

Now that we have a better understanding of how the Economic Elite dominate our lives, let’s take a look at exactly who they are…

Part II: The Rise of the Economic Elite — Economic Elite Vs. The People

The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

As a record number of US citizens are struggling to get by, many of the largest corporations are experiencing record-breaking profits, and CEOs are receiving record-breaking bonuses. How could this be happening; how did we get to this point?

The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America - Part I

The Economic Elite Vs. The People of the United States of America

AmpedStatus Report: It's time for 99% of Americans to mobilize and aggressively move on common sense political reforms. This is the first part of a six-part report. Introduction & Part I: Casualties of Economic Terrorism, Surveying the Damage.

Af-Pak War Racket: The Obama Illusion Comes Crashing Down

Af-Pak War Racket: The Obama Illusion Comes Crashing Down

AmpedStatus Report: The economic elite have escalated their attack on the U.S. public by surging military operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

--


CLICK HERE PLACE YOUR ADS ON AMPED STATUS






Amped content )))

During Economic Crisis Wealth of 400 Richest Americans Increased by $30 Billion

Posted on Friday, October 2nd, 2009 at 10:06 am, Filed under Economy, News . Follow post comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. Click here to comment, or trackback.admin

Post to Twitter  Post to Digg  Post to Facebook

By Les Leopold, Author of The Looting of America

During Economic Crisis Wealth of 400 Richest Americans Increased by $30 Billion

It’s great to know that during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans, according to Forbes, actually increased by $30 billion. Well golly, that’s only a 2 percent increase, much less than the double digit returns the wealthy had grown accustomed to. But a 2 percent increase is a whole lot more than losing 40 percent of your 401k. And $30 billion is enough to provide 500,000 school teacher jobs at $60k per year.

Collectively, those 400 have $1.57 trillion in wealth. It’s hard to get your mind around a number like that. The way I do it is to imagine that we were still living during the great radical Eisenhower era of the 1950s when marginal income tax rates hit 91 percent. Taxes were high back in the 1950s because people understood that constraining wild extremes of wealth would make our country stronger and prevent another depression. (Well, what did those old fogies know?)

Had we kept those high progressive taxes in place, instead of removing them, especially during the Reagan era, the Forbes 400 might each be worth “only” $100 million instead of $3.9 billion each. So let’s imagine that the rest of their wealth, about $1.53 trillion, were available for the public good.

What does $1.53 trillion buy?

It’s more than enough to insure the uninsured for the next twenty years or more.

It’s more than enough to create a Manhattan Project to solve global warming by developing renewable energy and a green, sustainable manufacturing sector.

And here’s my favorite: It’s more than enough to endow every public college and university in the country so that all of our children could gain access to higher education for free, forever!

Instead, we embarked on a grand experiment to see what would happen if we deregulated finance and changed the tax code so that millionaires could turn into billionaires. And even after that experiment failed in the most spectacular way, our system seems trapped into staying on the same deregulated path.

Instead of free higher education, health care and a sustainable economy, we got a fantasy finance boom and bust on Wall Street which crashed the real economy. We have our 400 billionaires, and we have 29 million unemployed and underemployed Americans. We have an infrastructure in shambles. We have an environment in crisis. We have a health care system that would make Rube Goldberg proud. And we have the worst income distribution since 1929.

I hazard to guess that each and every Forbes 400 member could get by with a net worth of $100 million. I don’t think that would kill their entrepreneurial drive or harm our economy–in fact it would be a major boon to the economy to step back from the edge of such massive concentration of wealth. The real problem is getting there form here. A wealth tax that kicks in when you become worth more than $100 million would be a good start. The Eisenhower tax rate on adjustable gross income over $3 million a year would help as well.

And please let’s not call it socialism, now that we’ve placed the entire financial sector on welfare to the tune of over $13 trillion in subsidies and guarantees. (By the way, the yearly budget outlays for means tested programs for low income citizens is about $350 billion per year. So Wall Street’s welfare is about 37 times as large as welfare for poor.)

So if narrowing the income/wealth gap isn’t socialism, what is it? It’s the America that thrived in the 1950s and 1960s. It’s the America that created a middle-class and vowed never to let the financial gamblers return us to another depression. It’s an America that put its people to work and built an infrastructure that was the envy of the world.

Where’s Dwight David Eisenhower when we need him?

– Les Leopold is the author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street’s Game of Fantasy Finance destroyed our Jobs, Pensions and Prosperity, and What We Can Do About It, Chelsea Green Publishing, June 2009.

Share/Save/Bookmark
Email This Post Email This Post

Related posts:

  1. How the 10 Richest in the US Made Their Billions By Adam Turl, Socialist Worker Back in February–when even the...
  2. Inside Goldman Sachs’ $57 Billion Subprime Scam By Greg Gordon | McClatchy Inside the thick Goldman Sachs...
  3. 2009 US Economy: Largest Transfer of Wealth to Financial/Political Elite in Global History By Carl Herman, Examiner Political “leadership” of the two oligarchy...
  4. Michael Lewis on the Economic Crisis and Future of Wall St. (Video) CNN's Fareed Zakaria talks to 'Liar's Poker' author Michael Lewis...
  5. National Economic Crisis Video Screenings & Forums: A New Way Forward By A New Way Forward The bailouts are widening the...

30 Responses to “During Economic Crisis Wealth of 400 Richest Americans Increased by $30 Billion”

  1. Bruce Budy said:

    Where does the $30 billion increase come from, when the Forbes article says that they “suffered’ a $300 billion loss?

  2. [...] * Workers between the age of 55 - 60, who have worked for 20 - 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  3. [...] * Workers between the age of 55 – 60, who have worked for 20 – 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  4. [...] As the looting is occurring at the top, the US middle class is just beginning to collapse. * Workers between the age of 55 - 60, who have worked for 20 - 29 years, have lost an average of25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  5. [...] * Workers between the age of 55 – 60, who have worked for 20 – 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  6. [...] * Workers between the age of 55 – 60, who have worked for 20 – 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  7. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. * Home foreclosure filings

  8. [...]  4) Workers between the ages of 55 to 60, who have worked for 20 to 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  9. [...] * Workers between the age of 55 - 60, who have worked for 20 - 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  10. [...] 4) Workers between the ages of 55 to 60, who have worked for 20 to 29 years, have lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans went up by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion. [...]

  11. The Rev said:

    It’s all and good to blame everything on not taxing the rich but this my friend is bull-shit. Our problems are so deep and entrenched that your little diatribe really says - well nothing at all - the richer you are you - the more taxes you should pay - ok duh. So what about the poorer you are the more you should be legally obligated to take whatever courses, job availabilities or career help offered before you go on welfare. You should be obligated to volunteer if you receive welfare at schools or soup kitchens. It IS socialism what your saying. 90% taxes on anyone is ridiculous - “good old Eisenhoweser” days and all. You are probably about middle class and write about these kinds of problems rather than coming out of your own pocket to deal with them. I am so tired of ignorant blanket statements by both the left and the right as to what is effective and good or bad. We all know right from wrong and can see who is contributing to the world and who isn’t - now we need to lose the PR spin and make black and white calls as to what needs to be - not whine like sad sack hippies at a pot rally.

  12. A Mukherjee said:

    There is a sustainable level of looting below which society will not react adversely. The filthy rich have researched this and know when to limit their profits, so nothing will ever come out of this, no revolutionary change in laws and taxes, no nothing, except silently accepting the rape.

  13. James Hughes said:

    “So let’s imagine that the rest of their wealth, about $1.53 trillion, were available for the public good. ”

    And by ‘available’ you mean if we had legally stolen what other men had produced. Without those men that $1.53 Trillion would not exist, and neither would the goods and services they sold to earn it.

  14. James Hughes said:

    It is also amusing that your book is titled “The Looting of America,” since that is precisely what you advocate.

  15. Stephen Fisher-Bradley said:

    Whenever anyone produces anything, the wherewithal to do so comes primarily from the produce of nature which was here before any humans and belongs equally to all, and the accumulated labour and ingenuity of 100s of generations of everyone’s ancestors. 99% of the people through history who have produced the wealth we all now enjoy were slaves, serfs, or ill-paid workers. The existing inequalities which give some more of an access to the common inheritance are the result of looting, slavery, war lordism, drug running, etc. No one becomes ultra wealthy from their own effort, we all stand on the shoulders of millions. To recognise and pay the share of the wealth that legitimately belongs to everyone, is not Socialism, because it is done by progressive taxation, in a way that preserves private property and free markets.
    When any person or corporation becomes too wealthy there is no free market because they have unfair advantages. Trimming the bloat is essential to preserve the free market.

  16. Agrees with Stephen Fisher-Bradley said:

    Couldn’t agree with you more Stephen, older cultures tend to understand this but unfortunately Columbus didn’t sale the Ocean Blue until 1692 (which isn’t even correct.. but hey, it rhymes)

  17. Ed Kitchen said:

    Hi, i must say fantastic site you have, i stumbled across it in Google. Does you get much traffic?

  18. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  19. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  20. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  21. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  22. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  23. [...] time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  24. [...] time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  25. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  26. [...] time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  27. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  28. [...] time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

  29. [...] same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point [...]

Leave a Reply